But then there is the next paragraph, which I am sure you accidentally forgot to post.
Palin's first veto </wiki/Veto> was used to block legislation that would have barred the state from granting benefits to the partners of gay state employees. In effect, her veto granted State of Alaska benefits to same-sex couples. The veto occurred after Palin consulted with Alaska's attorney general </wiki/Attorney_general> on the constitutionality of the legislation. So whether she supports this or not, this tells me that she wants to do what is right legally, not what she *feels* is right. I don't see anything wrong with that. Bruce Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > form the wikipedia article: > > Palin complied with an Alaskan state Supreme Court order and signed an > implementation of same-sex benefits into law under protest, stating > that legal options to avoid doing so had run out > > doesn't sound like she's really for it.... > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:267097 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
