On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:11 AM, David Churvis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You make an excellent point, and in an ideal world, I actually agree with
> you that marriage should be entirely a religious term defined on a
> church-by-church basis as it sees fit, with a separate system of civil
> unions that applies regardless of orientation.  However, attempting to
> divorce the religious marriage from the civil union will again be seen as
> "redefining marriage", and so it will never pass.  In fact, it would be
> faced with an even bigger backlash, as we would then, in a very real way, be
> "attacking other people's marriages."  So that would never pass muster.

I can see that opening a new can of worms. If the Church doesn't
sanction you're marriage people will assume you're gay. That could
eventually water down the use of the term marriage but I guess that's
the point you're making. They'll fight like hell to keep that from
happening. I'm just thinking this out as I type so bear with me.

> The bottom line is that we're not trying to redefine religious marriage
> anyway.  The equality we seek only extends to the civil protections of
> marriage.  The problem is that most people can't make the distinction, which
> reinforces my previous point that we'd never reach a point of separation
> between religious and civil marriage.

OK.

> So attempting to get civil unions everywhere would in effect leave us in a
> limbo where we have marriages for straight people and civil unions for gay
> people, and no way to rectify them.  They'd be separate but equal.  And we
> all know how well separate but equal works.

This confuses me; you don't want the religious aspect but won't accept
anything less.
I don't know enough about those supporting the ban to defend them; I
just figure they can't all be haters. My argument is that equal but
separate is a step closer while you think it's a step back.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280596
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to