Your refusal to answer the question pretty much tells me what I need to
know.

Once again, I was referring to the specific instance I was invovled in where
a union came in and even though som eemployees were against the union, they
were required to pay the union dues.  So, there were policies in place that
some, but not all, of the employees chose to chaneg by voting in the union.
 I see no difference there than if the employees were to have a vote to
allow telling racist/sexist jokes.  In both cases there is a change to the
way things are done.  In both cases the decision to make the change was made
by a majority of the employees, not the company that employs them.  In both
cases, in the world according to Gruss, the minority can and should be told,
if you don't like it, go elsewhere.

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Gruss Gott <grussg...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > Scott wrote:
> >
> > You have still not answered my question.
>
> It has no relevance.  You're all wrapped up in fairsy-fairsy.  Life
> ain't fair dude, and you don't have the right to work anywhere you
> want for any contract you want.
>
> The question is purely about the employment contract between the
> employer and employee.
>
> It has been deemed legal for employees to vote in a union for that
> purpose even if the employer would rather not.
>
> Life isn't fair.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:293122
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to