On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Gruss Gott<grussg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Scott wrote: >> 'not guilty' != 'innocent' >> > > 'not guilty' != 'guilty' either though.
I don't recall saying it did. > > Clearly, literally from outward appearances, MJ had some demons he was > battling. If a dude is willing to that disfigure himself (e.g, Joan > Rivers) he's clearly got some internal things he was dealing with. > > Almost as a rule, when you add in huge bucks, never being able to > trust anyone around you, never having known "normal", and living in > World completely closed off from our reality, the person is going to > be odd at a minimum. > > Toss in child abuse and drugs and you've got a real stew of weirdo going > there. > > So he is guilty of abusing the children or is he simply very odd? Why wold you treat these as mutually exclusive? > > I have no idea and neither does anyone else. > > The criminal justice system says he's not guilty. Right, the criminal justice system says they can't prove he did it. While that means he may not have done it, it also means he may have done it, but it can't be proven (see OJ example). -- Scott Stroz --------------- The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. - Thomas Jefferson http://xkcd.com/386 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299532 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
