actually you know... I read a rather intelligent analysis recently that said oh yeah he has anger problems and he apparently did beat the crap out of her but honestly would be not have hired someone if he really did it? And would a black man creeping through the shadows on as busy a street as Bundy in as white an enclave as Brentwood not have generated a few 911 calls? I don't really know LA well enough to answer that last bit, but a second look at the record of the LA police in general and of Mark Fuhrman in particular actually does raise a question in my mind.
I am no fan of sanctimonious wife-beaters, and yes, actually, that sort of violence usually does escalate. But if I force myself to really think about it.... I can't really point to a smoking gun. And Iwatched a huge chunk of that trial when it happened. On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Gruss Gott<grussg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Scott wrote: > >> 'not guilty' != 'innocent' > >> > > > > 'not guilty' != 'guilty' either though. > > I don't recall saying it did. > > > > > Clearly, literally from outward appearances, MJ had some demons he was > > battling. If a dude is willing to that disfigure himself (e.g, Joan > > Rivers) he's clearly got some internal things he was dealing with. > > > > Almost as a rule, when you add in huge bucks, never being able to > > trust anyone around you, never having known "normal", and living in > > World completely closed off from our reality, the person is going to > > be odd at a minimum. > > > > Toss in child abuse and drugs and you've got a real stew of weirdo going > there. > > > > So he is guilty of abusing the children or is he simply very odd? > > Why wold you treat these as mutually exclusive? > > > > > I have no idea and neither does anyone else. > > > > The criminal justice system says he's not guilty. > > Right, the criminal justice system says they can't prove he did it. > While that means he may not have done it, it also means he may have > done it, but it can't be proven (see OJ example). > > -- > Scott Stroz > --------------- > The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who > are willing to work and give to those who would not. - Thomas > Jefferson > > http://xkcd.com/386 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299544 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
