But it is still important to make clear that Robert wasn't wrong about the paper. It should not have been included, period. That was a mistake and needs to be acknowledged as such. There are plenty of strong claims that can be made with sufficient evidence behind them; we do not need to lower the standards of credibility.
Judah On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> That being said, the Himalayan glaciers have been retreating for 5 >> decades (see the link I posted earlier) and there is evidence that the >> rate is increasing. So the original claim may not be supported well >> enough to make it into the IPCC report but it also isn't a spurious >> claim either. >> >> That's what I was wondering. > > > > thanks > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311088 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
