Sure, as long as the evidence is acquired legally.

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> good. I take it then that you support penalties for the attempt to
> evade the Freedom of Information Act?
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am not a conservative, but I understand you have a very narrow view
>> of the world and everyone must fit into strictly defined categories
>> and fit into rigidly structured cubby-holes, so confusion on your part
>> is expected.
>>
>> I am all about personal responsibility. Like standing up for the fact
>> that you committed a crime and not trying to place blame on the
>> victim.
>>
>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Eric Roberts
>> <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It's called negligence.  And here I thought you were a conservative and all
>>> about personal responsibility...
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:19 AM
>>> To: cf-community
>>> Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
>>>
>>>
>>> So, there you go. You do indeed support blaming the victim. And here I
>>> thought you were a liberal.
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Eric Roberts
>>> <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I do think there should be a penalty assessed when you get hacked and it
>>> is
>>>> because you have a weak password.  Imagine how many IT headaches that
>>> would
>>>> solve.
>>>>
>>>> I think the moral of the story is that if you are going to do something
>>> that
>>>> is illegal...make sure you use a strong passwords and a good encryption
>>>> scheme....or at least one good enough to stop a teenager ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Eric
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 9:36 AM
>>>> To: cf-community
>>>> Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, kind of. You could say the lid on the mailbox is akin to a weak
>>>> password on your email. However it's kind of a moot point.
>>>>
>>>> The common argument here, and one which you seem to be parroting is the
>>>> "don't be surprised if..." argument. This I think loses the plot a bit
>>> here
>>>> as I don't think anyone is arguing about being surprised about the email
>>>> getting hacked with a weak-ass challenge response. However whether a turn
>>> of
>>>> events is surprising or unexpected doesn't make the crime any more or less
>>> a
>>>> crime.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Eric Roberts <
>>>> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's even a bad analogy.  The mail box isn't locked and cant be (or how
>>>>> else does mail get in), while your email is supposed to be secured.  If
>>>> you
>>>>> want to stick to the snail mail analogy, then maybe a PO box and you
>>> leave
>>>>> your key hanging on the box at the post office.  But again, if you don't
>>>>> secure thing and you leave it wide open, don't be surprised when someone
>>>>> comes it.  Not leaving it secured is akin to putting a neon sign over it
>>>>> and
>>>>> saying come on in...especially if you are a public figure.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:54 AM
>>>>> To: cf-community
>>>>> Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't really think comparing it to breaking into a house is a very good
>>>>> analogy. I think it's probably more accurate to equate it to taking mail
>>>>> out
>>>>> of someone's mail box. I believe this is a felony. And if someone did it
>>>>> you
>>>>> would blame the victim by saying "well the mailbox wasn't even locked."
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it sucks that some kid who guesses a password gets time, but it's
>>>> a
>>>>> crime and a massive, premeditated invasion of privacy. We need to protect
>>>>> that privacy, especially now as we're losing more and more of it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317299
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to