this is true.  I'm not sure what the chances are that it will work, probably 
under 50%.  For $20 it's probably worth a try.  It is a lot more portable than 
a cpap :)



On May 12, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Dana wrote:

> 
> I have heard that this works for some people. Much depends, I am told,
> on the exact structure of the throat and mouth.
> 
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
> <zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> IANAD, but I was diagnosed with sleep apnea about 6 years ago.  I used the 
>> machine for about 1 year before I finally got fed up with it.  I started 
>> using a 'bit' that would hold my lower jaw forward (I have a slight 
>> overbite).  Anyway, that cleared up my apnea just as well as the CPAP did.  
>> My CPAP has now been stored on the top shelf of my closet for 5 years.
>> 
>> The original bit that I got came from a dentistry outfit in Canada that sold 
>> it as a specialty bit for apnea.  When it got here, I realized it wasn't 
>> much different than a teeth grinding bit you get at the local drug store for 
>> $20.
>> 
>> Actually, nowadays, I don't even need to use it.  I guess my lower jaw has 
>> been trained to a more forward position now.
>> 
>> 
>> On May 11, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Dana wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 133, wow. Mine was described as very severe at 55. Amazed you didn't
>>> drive into anything.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:29 PM, William Bowen <william.bo...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I'm sorry for your brother's condition, but let me offer a
>>>> (admittedly-anecdotal but personal) counter-point.
>>>> 
>>>> First, I have insurance, it is very good insurance, it is very
>>>> expensive insurance. Everything I will speak about below is completely
>>>> covered by my insurance.
>>>> 
>>>> So, my wife tells me that she's been concerned for some time that I'm
>>>> not breathing right when I sleep. Between the loud snoring and the
>>>> stopping thereof, gasping for breath, etc. it's literally keeping her
>>>> up at night--not to mention worrying her.
>>>> 
>>>> I called my local clinic for an appointment, wait a couple weeks for
>>>> the schedule to clear, go see my doctor, tell her about my symptoms,
>>>> she recommends that I see a sleep specialist. I go with my referral to
>>>> the appointments desk and find that they can schedule me for a consult
>>>> with a sleep specialist in a month. 1st available appointment. My
>>>> insurance doesn't play a part in making doctors more available.
>>>> 
>>>> So I go to the appointment, describe my symptoms and my doctor says,
>>>> "we will schedule a sleep study as soon as possible."
>>>> 
>>>> So I go to schedule a sleep study. It's a month out, first available
>>>> time slot. Again, having insurance doesn't get me to the front of the
>>>> line... I go to my sleep study and they hook me to the machines, lots
>>>> of wires and whatnot.
>>>> 
>>>> My sleep study goes pretty well but I have to wait another three weeks
>>>> to get my results/follow-up consult. Again, insurance is no help
>>>> getting my results quicker.
>>>> 
>>>> At my follow-up, my doctor my doctor informs me that 5 apneas an hour
>>>> is considered "dangerous". My count was 133 observed apneas per hour
>>>> over the course of the 7.5 hour sleep study. My oxygen levels went as
>>>> low as 50%. I am (according to my doctor) at high risk for
>>>> heart-attack, stroke and possible plain-old suffocation.
>>>> 
>>>> So. I get fitted for a mask and take it home to start using it. The
>>>> settings are generally set, so I am getting airflow, but not optimal;
>>>> for that I need another sleep study and a follow-up.
>>>> 
>>>> The 2nd sleep study was performed three weeks ago. My follow-up
>>>> appointment at which my mask will finally be set to optimal "dosage"
>>>> so that treatment can actually begin is June 11. Once again, great
>>>> insurance doesn't help me go the the head of the line.
>>>> 
>>>> So six months later I will finally be able to begin treatment for
>>>> something that has been slowly killing me. This is the best on-demand
>>>> healthcare can do? How is the availability of and my possession of
>>>> insurance helping me get the treatment I need when I need it?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> My bro-inlaw in the UK was told he needed to be tested for kidney and
>>>>> prostate cancer six months ago. Three months later he got the tests,
>>>>> Last week he got the results. He needs surgery for both and is now
>>>>> going on the waiting list. He's only 50 and we're very afraid he won't
>>>>> make it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Eric Roberts
>>>>> <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From talking to actual Canadians who use the system every day and 
>>>>>> talking to
>>>>>> actual Brits, and talking people who live in a few other countries where
>>>>>> they have socialized medicine...while it may not be perfect (what system
>>>>>> is?)...it is far better than what we have now in the US. When you have no
>>>>>> more barriers to getting preventive care, you detect issues earlier, 
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> also means, in most cases, it's also a lot cheaper to treat and it also
>>>>>> reduces the amounts of people going to ER's for issues that should be
>>>>>> getting retaken care of in the doctors offices.  Plus, with a single 
>>>>>> system
>>>>>> of payment, it removes the layers and layers of complexity that doc's
>>>>>> offices have to deal with for payment.  There are a lot of cost 
>>>>>> reductions
>>>>>> in socialized medicine that do offset a lot of the increases in costs 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> the government picks up by sponsoring health care.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think the biggest deception in this whole issue is that opponents of
>>>>>> healthcare have convinced the teabaggers that there is a difference 
>>>>>> between
>>>>>> paying a premium to them and paying your premiums via taxes.  The only
>>>>>> difference there is who is getting paid.  So if you taxes go up and you 
>>>>>> no
>>>>>> longer have to pay an insurance premium (in the case of single payer), 
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> really is no logical difference in what is happening with your money.  
>>>>>> With
>>>>>> single payer, there is a good possibility that because this would be 
>>>>>> spread
>>>>>> out amongst a much larger pool of people, that what you are paying may be
>>>>>> considerably less.  So meanwhile the dumbass teabaggers, who have been 
>>>>>> duped
>>>>>> into bitching about resultant tax hikes form this, keep screaming about
>>>>>> taxes, the insurance company is laughing at their rubes all the way to 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> bank.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Personally...I would rather pay the government and know that I can get
>>>>>> treatment without going bankrupt than deal with the insurance companies 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> hospitals, knowing tat I will have to declare bankruptcy to deal with 
>>>>>> all my
>>>>>> medical bills since I don't have access to insurance(which is something 
>>>>>> I am
>>>>>> facing right no
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:318302
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to