On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Ian Skinner <h...@ilsweb.com> wrote:
> Whether or not that is worth pursuing as a policy and if it is > constitutional in the USA is a completely different argument. But one > is not supporting ones side well if one argues from the assumption that > removing guns overall will have *no* effect on illegal guns. I don't remember anyone arguing for that. >> So you've changed that from less sales to less victims of gun theft? > > Not changed, added a second point. I'm capable of discussing multiple > factors of a debate. Sounds like back peddling :) So when you said the illegal gun used in a drive-by likely started out as a legal gun you weren't implying legal guns are bad, you were trying to say the system works but could use a few improvements :) Finally we agre ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322812 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
