She was a speaking as a religious activist back then, not as a politician. I don't even know what she stands for now because her statements from 1996 seems to be the only thing people here care about.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Justin Scott <jscott-li...@gravityfree.com> wrote: > >> You could choose to skip the thread if you don't like it. > > Far from it, I find the discussion interesting but I do wish people would > stick to arguing the merits of their position rather than resorting to > personal attacks. I was just having some fun with Godwin's Law in this > case. > > In relation to the candidate in question, I don't particularly care for her. > She seems to be all about denying the extension rights to certain citizens, > resisting sex education, and generally focusing on people's sexual behavior > (not something the government has any business getting involved with, in my > opinion). From the little bit I can gather from Wikipedia I may actually > agree with her on financial matters, but since her campaign website appears > to be all about collecting donations without any actual content to speak of > I can't actually be sure. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:327375 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
