On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That's just it. > > No one is going against Business concerns. > The government isn't actively doing anything that would prevent > businesses from operating. > > If Government cannot pass any policies and protections that would in > any way reduce the profit of businesses, regardless of their effect on > the lives of the general populace, then it cannot Govern. > > There you go, using that word "any" again.
> Your policies cannot be restricted only to those that benefit > business. If that is what your fiscal policy is, then you don't have a > policy. > There you go, using that word "only" again. This is sophomoric on your part. > You have blank cheques signed and bills signed to be filled in by > Corporate interests. > You are effectively being controlled by Corporate interests, which 99% > of the time are against Public interests. > And here I thought I was only being controlled by my wife, and that 16 month old kid who spins me around like a goddamn top. > And I'll again use the regulation of the financial markets as an example. > > There is nothing wrong with reducing the profits of businesses to > benefit the general public. > Wrong answer. The correct answer is: Increase business profits AND benefit the general public. The two are not diametrically opposed. I know, that probably doesn't compute with you...but that's part of your "charm". -- Glittering prizes and endless compromises Shatter the illusion of integrity ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:327990 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
