On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: > > By your rules unless there was some way to secure the previous profit > margin of Businesses, there should have been no change to Credit Card > regulations. > And I don't agree with that. >
You don't agree with it because you still don't understand it...but I'm done trying to explain it. > There are times when the Public Interest, and Business Interests *ARE* > Diametrically opposed. > Yes, there are. But not in all cases, or not even in most cases, perhaps. This "Public" of which you speak...guess who they are? They are consumers. And guess how they get their money to consume...? That's right...they work at businesses. What is in the Public's best interest, is whatever creates the best environment for thriving business, but provides consumers protections against practices that hurt the free market dynamic...like monopolies and price fixing and gauging, etc. So.....why don't you ask your original question again...and let's see if we've found the answer yet. -- Glittering prizes and endless compromises Shatter the illusion of integrity ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:327995 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
