You're argument is that it wont happen because people will give in before the guns come. If the threat of guns wasn't there, law would be moot.
Your insults are accelerating. Post-election stress? . On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Exactly that is why I called it a stupid question. A really stupid > unrealistic question that only served as a metaphorical firebomb, and > further troll the list. > > But in reality what would happen is that if the franchisee (notice > franchisee and not McDonalds) would be taken to court, and be required > to pay a fine. They can appeal up to the supreme court if they so > choose. NO guns or firearms involved, unless the person has some weird > Rambo fantasy which I would not put past much of the right wing in > this country. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:331247 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
