As I said trolling the list instead of having a constructive discussion.

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You're argument is that it wont happen because people will give in
> before the guns come.
> If the threat of guns wasn't there, law would be moot.
>
> Your insults are accelerating. Post-election stress?
>
> .
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Exactly that is why I called it a stupid question. A really stupid
>> unrealistic question that only served as a metaphorical firebomb, and
>> further troll the list.
>>
>> But in reality what would happen is that if the franchisee (notice
>> franchisee and not McDonalds) would be taken to court, and be required
>> to pay a fine. They can appeal up to the supreme court if they so
>> choose. NO guns or firearms involved, unless the person has some weird
>> Rambo fantasy which I would not put past much of the right wing in
>> this country.
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:331251
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to