As I said trolling the list instead of having a constructive discussion. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You're argument is that it wont happen because people will give in > before the guns come. > If the threat of guns wasn't there, law would be moot. > > Your insults are accelerating. Post-election stress? > > . > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Exactly that is why I called it a stupid question. A really stupid >> unrealistic question that only served as a metaphorical firebomb, and >> further troll the list. >> >> But in reality what would happen is that if the franchisee (notice >> franchisee and not McDonalds) would be taken to court, and be required >> to pay a fine. They can appeal up to the supreme court if they so >> choose. NO guns or firearms involved, unless the person has some weird >> Rambo fantasy which I would not put past much of the right wing in >> this country. >> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:331251 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm