On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, GMoney <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think he was just offering both as examples of religious intolerance, > though you spun the banning of Sharia law into "banning murder and rape for > Muslims". Murder and rape is already banned, no matter what...that would > never be allowed. However, if some isolated community of Muslims in America > wanted to employ parts of Sharia Law, as long as they are within the > confines of American law...then they should be allowed to.
According to the USAToday article posted above Sharia law was used to override our laws. So my "spin" is spot on. > Also, anyone and everyone should be able to say "Christmas" whenever and > wherever they want. Should be but it's getting rarer. Very few corps have Christmas trees or parties. Now it's all Holiday this and that. But the point was he's comparing the request to refer to holiday trees as Christmas trees again to allowing Muslims to have forced sex in the name of religion as equivalents. Me thinks he could have made his point with a slightly more realistic comparison. . > Hope that provides some clarity. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345327 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
