And are you an expert in determining the scientific consensus or again are you just parroting the party line?
What do you want for your "settled science"? Which btw is only a term used by extremists who keep moving the goal posts each time more data is shown to support AGW. On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Like a broken record. > > Nobody is saying throw out all the science. They're just saying it is > not settled. > > . > > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Cameron Childress <camer...@gmail.com> wrote: >> - But finally - that the consequences of throwing out ALL the science >> and ignoring it are so dire that we HAVE to consider action now, even if >> part or all of the science is proven wrong later. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:346225 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
