I think Romney would be a better leader than Obama, but then I also think there's mostly lock-in to policy thus I don't think Romney would DO anything different, he'd just market it different.
Plus there is policy room on social issues and any Republican is essentially anti-personal liberty. Thus Obama it is. On Feb 20, 2012, at 11:17 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > but here's the thing. What's the alternative? Mr "I am going to win > because I have the most money"? Gringrich? I remember when he had > power before, and how he lost it. Santorum froths at the mouth when he > talks about women's health care. Paul looks plausible until you really > give him a good look. > > Obama is at least sane, and presumably has learned better by now, or > at least I fucking hope so... > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd like to think you are right, but I don't think you are. I think he >> looked for the least bad way out, and that was winning. And even at >> that, it was more a matter of declaring victory, it seems. I think it >> is good to have an open mind, and try to keep one myself, but it still >> boils down to sometimes it isn't good to meet people halfway if their >> minds are made up. Hopefully those minds were made up based on fact. >> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Gruss Gott <grussg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 20, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Judah McAuley <ju...@wiredotter.com> wrote: >>>> You know what I'll never be able to forgive Obama for? A bunch of >>>> things, but first and foremost is the fact that he flat out refused to >>>> investigate and prosecute the crimes of his predecessor. "Healing >>>> wounds", "looking to the future" and shit like that. Fuck that. >>> >>> Here's the thing: >>> >>> (1.) We'll never know why Bush invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. We can guess >>> and speculate and argue, but we'll never know. >>> >>> (2.) What we can and do know is that a guy who couldn't be more different >>> from Bush, a guy who voted against Iraq invasion, a guy who campaigned >>> against it, a guy who's taken a huge political hit for it ... Not only has >>> supported it in office, but doubleded down on the policy. >>> >>> That should tell us something very very scary is happening; something that >>> can't be made public. Thus no prosecutions. >>> >>> Something so scary that philosophy turns to atoms under its weight. >>> >>> I wonder what it is? >>> >>> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347367 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
