I don't know either. It's one thing to have the feds raid a private medical marijuana dispensary that is licensed by the state and another thing to raid one that is actually run by the state. I wonder if the state will try and get out of the law and not set up the infrastructure it calls for, saying it is preempted by Federal law? I'm sure that at least someone will bring a suit saying that Federal law takes precedence, but I wonder if it will be in state court, federal court or both. Interesting stuff.
Cheers, Judah On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:30 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Awesome. > > Will be intersting to see how the fed handles it. > > Are they going raid state owned and run facilities? A lot of risk and > potential reward there. > > Would the state use its LEOs and NG to defend its public property? When > will the argument about the requirement for a constitutional ammendment > having been required for prohibition of alcohol be made? > > Where is our ability to redress grievences? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:356657 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
