Answer the question then, given the vast weight of data, why do you think that there is no global warming?
An interesting preso on the topic by the scientist I previously cited, it ties in current research from some very different fields of study, all of which points towards human caused global warming, with full citations btw. http://www.jamespowell.org/resources/Presentation-Slides/Talksspring2012web.ppt On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Stop flaunting your ignorance. > > . > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> From an interesting analysis of papers published in peer reviewed >> scientific journals that have looked at global warming: >> >> 24 of the 13,950 articles, 0.17% or 1 in 581, clearly reject global >> warming or endorse a cause other than CO2 emissions for observed >> warming. The list of articles that reject global warming is here. The >> 24 articles have been cited a total of 113 times over the nearly >> 21-year period, for an average of close to 5 citations each. >> Desmogblog (http://s.tt/1tBXZ) >> >> So given the sheer weight of the data here, 0.17% of all studies >> published in legit journals over a 20 year period do not support human >> caused global warming. It is simply stupefying that someone would >> reject global warming being caused by people. That is substituting >> wishful or magical thinking. Sort of like imagining you can fly, and >> to prove it you jump off a building and believe as hard as you can >> that you can fly all the way down. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359483 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
