>From an interesting analysis of papers published in peer reviewed scientific journals that have looked at global warming:
24 of the 13,950 articles, 0.17% or 1 in 581, clearly reject global warming or endorse a cause other than CO2 emissions for observed warming. The list of articles that reject global warming is here. The 24 articles have been cited a total of 113 times over the nearly 21-year period, for an average of close to 5 citations each. Desmogblog (http://s.tt/1tBXZ) So given the sheer weight of the data here, 0.17% of all studies published in legit journals over a 20 year period do not support human caused global warming. It is simply stupefying that someone would reject global warming being caused by people. That is substituting wishful or magical thinking. Sort of like imagining you can fly, and to prove it you jump off a building and believe as hard as you can that you can fly all the way down. On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Cameron Childress <camer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Not at all. >> >> It claims climate change is real > > > Right... Okay. Again, your link.... > > >> while telling you to ignore the facts behind the curtain ie Alaska and >> Siberia are the coldest they've been in decades. > > > Nowhere does is suggest ignoring anything. In fact, the article is > specifically about this. You really do go to painstaking > and convoluted illogical lengths avoid the entire scientific community's > conclusions. > > -Cameron > > ... > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359478 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
