On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is that all you can come up with? That is pathetic. Even a freshman > psychology student with a "C" average could do better.
Yet you still get it wrong. > The Kanai et al (Meaning Collin Firth) (2012) study was legitimate and has > been replicated > with samples involving middle age Londoners, and in the US. Moreover NOT. I explained to you repeatedly why it failed and you seem to think I'll forget so you keep repeating old arguments. The fMRI is proven repeatedly to be shady science. It's like statistics, it can be used to say whatever you want, that's why the Actor paid to use it. Guaranteeing, the results he paid for. As for the Oxley study, is that a joke? Did you write it? Come on Larry, try to take this seriously. If we're going to pass this crap off as science than we're in bug trouble. > in an earlier study (Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., > Hibbing, M. V., Miller, M.S., Hatemi, P. K., et al. (2008). Political > attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 16671670.) > the authors found that individuals with measurably lower physica ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360584 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
