And did you really understand the article. The Kanai study used a
different method not based on voxel estimation. Moreover given the
matrix of results, AEP, GSR, behavioral, cognitive measures etc. that
all point to the same conclusion it sort of gives a hint that there
may actually be something there. NOT ONE single method, but multiple
methods, different samples, different methodologies, and they all
point to the same thing. Its like this Sam, if you have an aerial
photograph of a region, a map of the same place and verbal directions
all pointing towards the same thing, pardon me for having a wild guess
that they all may be saying the same thing.

Not one study, not one methodology, not one sample but multiple
samples, methodologies and studies. You have a fundamental ignorance
of the scientific approach here. Get educated instead of showing how
much you do not understand, and more importantly are not willing to
understand. What do you need Wilder Penfield and Antonov Luria to come
from on high, poke you in the ACG or Amygdala and tell you that? WTF
do you think that these multiple studies with methodologies are
saying?

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Is that all you can come up with? That is pathetic. Even a freshman
>> psychology student with a "C" average could do better.
>
> Yet you still get it wrong.
>
>>  The Kanai et al (Meaning Collin Firth) (2012) study was legitimate and has 
>> been replicated
>> with samples involving middle age Londoners, and in the US. Moreover
>
> NOT. I explained to you repeatedly why it failed and you seem to think
> I'll forget so you keep repeating old arguments. The fMRI is proven
> repeatedly to be shady science. It's like statistics, it can be used
> to say whatever you want, that's why the Actor paid to use it.
> Guaranteeing, the results he paid for.
>
> As for the Oxley study, is that a joke? Did you write it? Come on
> Larry, try to take this seriously. If we're going to pass this crap
> off as science than we're in bug trouble.
>
>> in an earlier study (Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R.,
>> Hibbing, M. V., Miller, M.S., Hatemi, P. K., et al. (2008). Political
>> attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670.)
>> the authors found that individuals with measurably lower physica
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360591
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to