And did you really understand the article. The Kanai study used a different method not based on voxel estimation. Moreover given the matrix of results, AEP, GSR, behavioral, cognitive measures etc. that all point to the same conclusion it sort of gives a hint that there may actually be something there. NOT ONE single method, but multiple methods, different samples, different methodologies, and they all point to the same thing. Its like this Sam, if you have an aerial photograph of a region, a map of the same place and verbal directions all pointing towards the same thing, pardon me for having a wild guess that they all may be saying the same thing.
Not one study, not one methodology, not one sample but multiple samples, methodologies and studies. You have a fundamental ignorance of the scientific approach here. Get educated instead of showing how much you do not understand, and more importantly are not willing to understand. What do you need Wilder Penfield and Antonov Luria to come from on high, poke you in the ACG or Amygdala and tell you that? WTF do you think that these multiple studies with methodologies are saying? On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Is that all you can come up with? That is pathetic. Even a freshman >> psychology student with a "C" average could do better. > > Yet you still get it wrong. > >> The Kanai et al (Meaning Collin Firth) (2012) study was legitimate and has >> been replicated >> with samples involving middle age Londoners, and in the US. Moreover > > NOT. I explained to you repeatedly why it failed and you seem to think > I'll forget so you keep repeating old arguments. The fMRI is proven > repeatedly to be shady science. It's like statistics, it can be used > to say whatever you want, that's why the Actor paid to use it. > Guaranteeing, the results he paid for. > > As for the Oxley study, is that a joke? Did you write it? Come on > Larry, try to take this seriously. If we're going to pass this crap > off as science than we're in bug trouble. > >> in an earlier study (Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., >> Hibbing, M. V., Miller, M.S., Hatemi, P. K., et al. (2008). Political >> attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 16671670.) >> the authors found that individuals with measurably lower physica > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360591 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm