A turd times 1000 is still a pile of shit.

Find a real study, a valid one and we''ll talk.

.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And did you really understand the article. The Kanai study used a
> different method not based on voxel estimation. Moreover given the
> matrix of results, AEP, GSR, behavioral, cognitive measures etc. that
> all point to the same conclusion it sort of gives a hint that there
> may actually be something there. NOT ONE single method, but multiple
> methods, different samples, different methodologies, and they all
> point to the same thing. Its like this Sam, if you have an aerial
> photograph of a region, a map of the same place and verbal directions
> all pointing towards the same thing, pardon me for having a wild guess
> that they all may be saying the same thing.
>
> Not one study, not one methodology, not one sample but multiple
> samples, methodologies and studies. You have a fundamental ignorance
> of the scientific approach here. Get educated instead of showing how
> much you do not understand, and more importantly are not willing to
> understand. What do you need Wilder Penfield and Antonov Luria to come
> from on high, poke you in the ACG or Amygdala and tell you that? WTF
> do you think that these multiple studies with methodologies are
> saying?
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360592
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to