A turd times 1000 is still a pile of shit. Find a real study, a valid one and we''ll talk.
. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > And did you really understand the article. The Kanai study used a > different method not based on voxel estimation. Moreover given the > matrix of results, AEP, GSR, behavioral, cognitive measures etc. that > all point to the same conclusion it sort of gives a hint that there > may actually be something there. NOT ONE single method, but multiple > methods, different samples, different methodologies, and they all > point to the same thing. Its like this Sam, if you have an aerial > photograph of a region, a map of the same place and verbal directions > all pointing towards the same thing, pardon me for having a wild guess > that they all may be saying the same thing. > > Not one study, not one methodology, not one sample but multiple > samples, methodologies and studies. You have a fundamental ignorance > of the scientific approach here. Get educated instead of showing how > much you do not understand, and more importantly are not willing to > understand. What do you need Wilder Penfield and Antonov Luria to come > from on high, poke you in the ACG or Amygdala and tell you that? WTF > do you think that these multiple studies with methodologies are > saying? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360592 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm