It is?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't agree. > While a few thumpers might try to change policy, it's not that likely. > But the infringing on freedom to worship is getting stronger each > year. > > . > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:15 AM, GMoney <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Judah McAuley <ju...@wiredotter.com > >wrote: > > > >> > >> I can see that. I tend to view it the opposite way because the bible > >> thumpers tend to have a concrete impact on my life (see marriage > equality > >> laws, prayer in school, buying liquor on Sunday, lack of coverage for > birth > >> control in health plans, etc) whereas militant atheists tend to be > fairly > >> harmless cranks. If Atheists were running government and trying to > clamp > >> down on otherwise chill religious folks, I'd probably feel the other way > >> around. > >> > > > > I agree with what everyone's said. It would seem that perhaps we feel > that > > while mouthy atheists are more annoying, the bible thumpers are perhaps > > more dangerous, since they actually carry influence and can affect > policy. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:361122 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
