Most of the research people talk about for Global Warming shows around 30 yrs of increase when the reality is that it's far too short a time period to accurately indicate a MAJOR shift in change.
In the book Dragon's of Eden, Sagan talked a lot about the time period of the human species representing a single calendar day in the time period that represents the lifetime of the world. This is a difficult thing for most people to comprehend because most can't even fathom what a $1 trillion would look like. The scale need to measure climate change over time really needs to be represented in thousands of years, not hundreds of years. I'm not saying that we human's are dumping and polluting the planet, but I certainly think there is a lot of BS going around to increase control and introduce new policies. I'm not a believer in Global Warming on the scale that this "majority". A source to better illustrate my thoughts would be to look at the cycle of ice ages and Glacial-interglacial cycles over the last few hundred thousand years. The research we collect is only seeing peaks and valleys in a really really small segment of time and hardly represents any solid evidence of global warming. http://geology.utah.gov/surveynotes/gladasked/gladice_ages.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:363261 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
