Blah blah blah blah...the emails showed nothing...

-----Original Message-----
From: RobG [mailto:sled...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 12:38 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Belief in biblical end-times stifling climate change action
in U.S.: study


On 3 May 2013 12:56, Jerry Barnes <critic...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> "Belief in biblical end-times stifling climate change action"
>
> That sounds about right.
>
> It has nothing to do with climategate, the coldest spring on record, 
> the extended sun cycle that is ending, the dissenting scientists who 
> are finally turning against the current, the outright lies by 
> organizations like the UN, the stifling regulations associated 
> implementing "change",
the
> hypocrisy of the leaders of the cult of man-made global warming 
> climate change, and so on.
>
> J
>

That would be because they would rather try to blame "religion"
(specifically, Christianity) so they can accuse those of us who KNOW that
man-made global warming doesn't exist, with being stupid or ignorant or
whatever fits their agenda at the moment.

The whole notion of there being a "consensus" is utter BS. In science, there
is no consensus.  There is only fact.

The emails from East Anglia a few years ago have gone a long way to proving
that it's a hoax, among other things.  It's all aimed at getting people to
allow more and more government control and taxation.  And any attempts to
argue this with the believers turns into a hate-filled argument as they call
you every name in the book.



On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> The "dissenting" scientists are in a distinct minority.
>
> But you can choose to believe them instead of the majority of science 
> if you like.
>
> I suppose there are people that believe we never landed on the moon, 
> and point to the one or two "scientists" who support their point of view.
>
> There is no question that man is contributing enormously to the 
> warming of the climate.
>
>
>

The "dissenting" scientists aren't in a minority.  They are in fact the
majority... just not as many have yet spoken up as loudly as the ones who
want to jump on the bandwagon.

There is EVERY reason to doubt that we are "contributing enormously."  It's
utter BS.  Here's a perfect example.  A volcanic eruption.  A typical
volcanic eruption releases more CO2 into the atmosphere at one time than the
entire plan does in a YEAR.  And what happens?  Sure, there's some ash fall,
and there may be some COOLING due to the ash in the atmosphere, over the
local area.  If it's a huge eruption, it might affect some other areas.
 But in not a lot of time, the planet has absorbed it and "cleaned up after
itself."

How about the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.  Where's all the oil?  Yeah
some washed ashore, but most of it is just plain GONE. You don't see that in
the media, of course, because it goes against the CONSENSUS.

http://abcnews.go.com/WN/bp-oil-spill-crude-mother-nature-breaks-slick/story
?id=11254252#.UYP1ZZXy_lI

http://www.examiner.com/article/bp-gulf-oil-spill-update-the-leaked-oil-pull
s-disappearing-act-where-has-all-the-oil-gone

Not that you'll read those links; you guys all believe (like a cult) that
you're right and so you will dismiss evidence as blasphemy.

Rob




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:363266
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to