Not by honorable, civilized people

-----Original Message-----
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:27 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Slaughter of civilians by Israel...


Both can and should be targeted if being used for military operations.
On Jul 15, 2014 10:18 PM, "Eric Roberts" <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com>
wrote:

>
> You left off hospitals and schools...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:49 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Slaughter of civilians by Israel...
>
>
> We never had any fire support larger than company mortars allowed to 
> fire, except aviation like twice.
>
> I know during my deployment we had a few mistakes.  For us mainly 
> caused by the mistrust of the Afghan army and national police.  People 
> trying to run a tcp, because the locals are as likely to rape, rob and 
> murder them as to search and protect.
>
> In this situation, with indirect fires, I think counter battery 
> operations are 100% the right answer from the perspective of doctrine 
> tactically, although some what against some of the objectives 
> strategically and operationally.
>
> Doubly so when you consider how small a pool of candidate's that the 
> Israelis have to draw from.  Preserve the force structure, destroy the 
> enemies communication, command and control and logistics.  Alienate 
> the local population.
> On Jul 15, 2014 5:34 PM, "Bruce Sorge" <sor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > While there have been incidents of collateral damage caused by US 
> > forces (usually planes dropping huge ass bombs), we do try very hard 
> > not to do this. Case in point.
> > When I was in Tikrit back in '05, the insurgents would launch four 
> > or five attacks against our FOB each week during the fighting season 
> > from
> orchards.
> > We already had these locations indexed, so as soon as they shot at 
> > us, we fired back with our artillery. However, the the game changer 
> > was when they started launching attacks from within the city. Once 
> > that happened, no more counter attacks with artillery. Instead, we'd 
> > send a QRF into the sector and kick down doors. The problem though 
> > was that they were not using homes to attack us, they were using 
> > pickup trucks with the rocket launchers or mortars in the bed, 
> > hidden using 55 gallon drums or tarps. So we pretty much had to suck 
> > it up when it came
> to
> attacks from then on.
> >
> > As far as what goes through the mind of someone who has to do this, 
> > I don't know. I am an infantryman. I kick down doors and go on 
> > patrols looking for the enemy,  I don't fire artillery on them.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > How terribly hard it must be on the soldiers who are ordered to 
> > > carry out these missions, even given that they are permitted.
> > > Knowing that you are firing on non-combatants must be awful
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Bruce Sorge <sor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Tim is right. According to the Protocol Additional to the Geneva 
> > > > Conventions of 12 August, 1949 and relating to the Protection of
> > Victims
> > > of
> > > > International Armed Conflicts (Protocol l), 8 June 1977, 
> > > > launching an attack on a military target that is being shielded 
> > > > by civilians is not
> > > off
> > > > limits. Part of this states
> > > > "(c) effective advance warning shall be given of attacks which 
> > > > may
> > affect
> > > > the civilian population, unless circumstances do not permit."
> > > >
> > > > Of course when you read all of it, they go to great length to 
> > > > deter
> > such
> > > > operations, but it's not prohibited per se.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.icrc.org/ihl/WebART/470-750073?OpenDocument
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:371624
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to