You said _nothing_ about acceptible risk. You said "My attitude is if you can't go there safely then don't go UNTIL SUCH TIME as you CAN go there safely."
If you meant to say 'reasonably safe', then of course, most people would agree with you. ======================================================================= Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -----Original Message----- > From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:58 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: space shuttle columbia accident > > > Hmm...so therefore there can never be a risk that is too high > for sending men and women into space. > > Interesting point of view. > > -Gel > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Since when has exploration been without risk?? Hell, nothing > in life is 100% safe. You can't drive to the grocery w/ 100% > assurance you will get there alive. > > -rc > > Safely? Ok so you can no longer fly a plane, drive a car, > eat at a resturant or have children. All of these things are > more likely to kill you than flying in the shuttle. > > Tim > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
