well here is another way to look at it. <devil's advocate mode> Sex with underage girls may well cause harm to the underage girls. Letting this woman wear a veil harms who exactly? </devil's advocate mode>
Dana On Wed, 28 May 2003 15:07:37 -0500, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At what point do we say that it doesn't matter WHAT your religous > beliefs are? What if your religion says its ok to have sex with underage > girls - does that mean we have to allow it? Of course not. > > -rc > >> >> Only if it's part of your religious beliefs.... >> >> On Wed, 28 May 2003 15:31:43 -0400, Jerry Johnson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > You can't make her show her face, but if she is unwilling to get a > >> photo >> > id, then you can't give her a driver's licence photo ID that cannot be >> > used to prove visual identity. >> > >> > If she can get a photo ID that completely obscures her identity, then >> > the >> > idea of photo on the ID has just become an unnecessary part of the > >> license. OR I should be able to wear a Nixon mask when having my license >> > taken. >> > >> > Jerry Johnson >> > >> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/03 03:04PM >>> >> > Well, if there is a question as to whether or not showing her face is >> > in violation of her religious beliefs, why wouldn't the book that is > >> the basis of such beliefs be used as evidence? >> > >> > Remember it just Congress shall make no law respecting an > >> establishment >> > of >> > religion or permitting the free exercise thereof. If forcing her to >> show > her >> > face prevents the free exercise of her religion then you can't make >> her > show >> > her face. >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, >> >> 2003 >> >> 2:55 PM >> >> To: CF-Community >> >> Subject: Re: Makes you shake your head. >> >> >> >> What I find worrying is that a copy of the Quran has been entered >> >> into evidence. I would think that it would be plainly obvious by now >> >> to everyone that basing a court decision in any manner on a religious >> >> belief is not allowed anywhere in the US. >> >> >> >> I'm not sure about the process, but I think the prosecution would be >> >> within it's rights to ask that it be made inadmissible as evidence. >> >> Perhaps they are angling for a guaranteed way to appeal though. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> jon >> >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 2:35:57 PM, you wrote: >> >> RC> Why would this even be going to trial? Do you have the >> RC> >> consitutional right to get a drivers license? Why doesn't she >> RC> >> simply take a bus >> >> then? >> >> >> >> RC> -rc >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> >> From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, >> >> May 28, 2003 12:31 PM >> >> >> To: CF-Community >> >> >> Subject: Makes you shake your head. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I can't believe this woman was allowed to take a driver's license >> >> >> photo with a veil in the first place. Additionally, if she wants >> >> >> to take the photo veiled, does that mean she'll be driving veiled >> >> >> too. Isn't that just a tad bit dangerous.... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> RC> http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/28/license.veil.ap/index.html >> >> >> >> >> >> RC> >> >> >> > >> > >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
