while I'm a tightwad and won't buy one right now, I really, really WANT one.
<g>
I just happen to know a bit about dtv because we worked with the local PBS
station with some digital transition stuff.
-Kevin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erika L Walker-Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:37 AM
Subject: RE: HD Tee vees..
> Just so no one picks on Phil for buying a $1400 TV. As long as it
> doesn't break, we'll have this for years. The money we'll save from NOT
> going to the movies and watching them at home, on a screen he likes for
> the big effects, will far outweigh and pay for the TV in the next year
> or two. It's a hobby of his so to speak. Watching movies, watching his
> wrestling, playing his video games. To us, it's necessary enjoyment. And
> don't get the wrong idea, we do outside stuff too. We're not couch
> potatoes!
>
> Now, if you never turn it on ... or you only watch it once a week for
> the news, then yeah, that's a huge waste of money.
>
> We see the benefit. but that is us. to each their own right?! :D
>
> Cheers,
> Erika
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:21 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: HD Tee vees..
>
>
> I consider any TV over $400 to be too expensive. Notice that I did say
> "IMO". This goes along with the frugality thread Erika started. I'm a
> tightwad. I have a TV that works fine. Is it HD? No, but honestly I
> don't
> see enough benefit for me to balance the expense vs just keeping what I
> have. It's why I keep driving my old '89 Mazda too.
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
