Dunno if your average technophobe even has a computer.

> It's an idea, duh

> Does you average technophobe fill out forms? Anone know?

> Dana

>>Replace the pages that have email addresses listed with a
>>FORM that will send
>>email to the contacts.
>>
>>This way the email addresses are hidden from the
>>harvesters.
>>
>>======================================
>>Stop spam on your domain, Anti-spam solutions
>>http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
>>For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
>>======================================
>>Aspire to Inspire before you Retire or Expire!
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "dana tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 11:52 PM
>>Subject: Re:WOW. I just spammed myself.
>>
>>
>>: I am having a similar problem with the prunebelly
>>domain. As far as I can
>>tell, there is no way to protect our email addresses from
>>harvesters since we
>>are an outreach organization and really need the addresses
>>on the website... or
>>am I missing something?
>>:
>>: All suggestions welcome. I know we are not an open
>>relay. What I am getting is
>>that a certain email address, which is valid on the
>>domain, is supposed to be
>>sending pornographic spam. The address does not forward
>>anywhere and I can see
>>that it is not being used at all. So the name was just
>>grabbed off the webpage
>>and is beng used for spoofing, right?
>>:
>>: Dana
>>:
>>: >> S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
>>: >>>
>>: >>> In the last week I've been getting a ton of
>>mailerdaemon
>>: >>> responses
>>: >>> saying that messages I (didn't) send couldn't be
>>received
>>: >>> by people I
>>: >>> don't know because they don't exist at the target
>>domain.
>>: >>> (Or their
>>: >>> mailboxes are full.)
>>: >>>
>>: >>> They always come back FROM:
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
>>: >>> or some
>>: >>> other nonsense...
>>: >>>
>>: >>> Which is great. I'm sure I can expect my domain to
>>be in
>>: >>> the SPEWS any
>>: >>> day now...
>>: >
>>: >> Not for that, they have sufficient clue to read
>>headers.
>>: >
>>: >> FWIW, I am averaging about 6000 Joe-Job bounces per
>>day
>>: >> for the last 6 months and the domains only show up in
>>: >> NANAS about once every month.
>>: >
>>: >> Jochem
>>: >
>>: >Ahh okay, well that helps me feel a bit better, thanks.
>>:) I was
>>: >freakin' out, thinking I wouldn't be able to send mail
>>to anyone soon.
>>: >:) Though I'm sure there are a probably not
>>insignificant number of
>>: >sysadmins who don't take the time to be thorough about
>>the headers, so
>>: >I suspect it's inevitably going to happen with certain
>>individual
>>: >domains, and I'll just have to hope that I don't have a
>>real reason to
>>: >do business with those individual sites.
>>: >
>>: >
>>: >s. isaac dealey                214-823-9345
>>: >
>>: >team macromedia volunteer
>>http://www.macromedia.com/go/team
>>: >
>>: >chief architect, tapestry cms
>>http://products.turnkey.to
>>: >
>>: >onTap is open source
>>http://www.turnkey.to/ontap
>>: >
>>: >
>>:
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to