One of the people told me very seriously that she does not want a blog because it is too hard.
<g> don't get me started.
But yeah, if the email address is not being used then gee I guess it does not need to be on the website. (smacks forehead) Just a matter of deciding who should get what mail. And writing the form, which is not trivial for a newbie like me. Standby for questions on cf-newbie <g>
But good idea, Doug. Sometimes it takes another person to point out the obvious.
Dana
>Dunno if your average technophobe even has a computer.
>
>> It's an idea, duh
>
>> Does you average technophobe fill out forms? Anone know?
>
>> Dana
>
>>>Replace the pages that have email addresses listed with a
>>>FORM that will send
>>>email to the contacts.
>>>
>>>This way the email addresses are hidden from the
>>>harvesters.
>>>
>>>======================================
>>>Stop spam on your domain, Anti-spam solutions
>>>http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
>>>For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
>>>======================================
>>>Aspire to Inspire before you Retire or Expire!
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "dana tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 11:52 PM
>>>Subject: Re:WOW. I just spammed myself.
>>>
>>>
>>>: I am having a similar problem with the prunebelly
>>>domain. As far as I can
>>>tell, there is no way to protect our email addresses from
>>>harvesters since we
>>>are an outreach organization and really need the addresses
>>>on the website... or
>>>am I missing something?
>>>:
>>>: All suggestions welcome. I know we are not an open
>>>relay. What I am getting is
>>>that a certain email address, which is valid on the
>>>domain, is supposed to be
>>>sending pornographic spam. The address does not forward
>>>anywhere and I can see
>>>that it is not being used at all. So the name was just
>>>grabbed off the webpage
>>>and is beng used for spoofing, right?
>>>:
>>>: Dana
>>>:
>>>: >> S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
>>>: >>>
>>>: >>> In the last week I've been getting a ton of
>>>mailerdaemon
>>>: >>> responses
>>>: >>> saying that messages I (didn't) send couldn't be
>>>received
>>>: >>> by people I
>>>: >>> don't know because they don't exist at the target
>>>domain.
>>>: >>> (Or their
>>>: >>> mailboxes are full.)
>>>: >>>
>>>: >>> They always come back FROM:
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
>>>: >>> or some
>>>: >>> other nonsense...
>>>: >>>
>>>: >>> Which is great. I'm sure I can expect my domain to
>>>be in
>>>: >>> the SPEWS any
>>>: >>> day now...
>>>: >
>>>: >> Not for that, they have sufficient clue to read
>>>headers.
>>>: >
>>>: >> FWIW, I am averaging about 6000 Joe-Job bounces per
>>>day
>>>: >> for the last 6 months and the domains only show up in
>>>: >> NANAS about once every month.
>>>: >
>>>: >> Jochem
>>>: >
>>>: >Ahh okay, well that helps me feel a bit better, thanks.
>>>:) I was
>>>: >freakin' out, thinking I wouldn't be able to send mail
>>>to anyone soon.
>>>: >:) Though I'm sure there are a probably not
>>>insignificant number of
>>>: >sysadmins who don't take the time to be thorough about
>>>the headers, so
>>>: >I suspect it's inevitably going to happen with certain
>>>individual
>>>: >domains, and I'll just have to hope that I don't have a
>>>real reason to
>>>: >do business with those individual sites.
>>>: >
>>>: >
>>>: >s. isaac dealey 214-823-9345
>>>: >
>>>: >team macromedia volunteer
>>>http://www.macromedia.com/go/team
>>>: >
>>>: >chief architect, tapestry cms
>>>http://products.turnkey.to
>>>: >
>>>: >onTap is open source
>>>http://www.turnkey.to/ontap
>>>: >
>>>: >
>>>:
>>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
