marksmanship standards in the Canadian Army if that's what you think. We're
talking about FN-FAL, AR-15, AK-47 variants. All in SEMI-AUTO, not full
auto. These weapons can be very accurate. Also they are fun as hell to
shoot.
Beyond all of that, the second amendment protects our right to arm ourselves
for defense, not hunting or target shooting.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lyons, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 8:37 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Assault Weapons Ban
Fortunately given that the ban was attached to a pretty nasty bill
indemnifying firearms makers from lawsuits, its acceptable. Its so-called
rejection was simply a parliamentary maneuver. Also there are at least two
other bills with amendments before congress that extends the ban.
Besides what's the use of this sort of firearm to people. What is it
really
good for but to kill lots of people. Its not something that you can hunt
with - this sort of weapon is inaccurate beyond a hundred yards. All its
good for is killing people. Better to get rid of that sort of weapon.
larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 6:24 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Assault Weapons Ban
>
>
> Thank god. Reason and literacy in congress?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Braver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 3:57 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Assault Weapons Ban
>
>
> I just heard something about Congress voting to not extend the
> ban when it expires.
>
> -Ben
>
> >Driving in I just missed them saying something about the
> Assault Weapons
> >Ban. It sounded like the police were asking lawmakers to
> renew the ban in
> >their vote today, but I thought the expiration wasn't until Sept.
> >
> >Anyone hear anything about this?
> >
> >-Kevin
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
