Joe-
I'll weigh in here and try to make it simple:
Q: What is different in WDDX?
A: Everything. Every slice, splice and piece of code. Completely and totally different.
What is changed in the syntax? Not much.
The question everyone wants to know is: What code are you running that you are saying
is slower than CF5?
Much like the current thread on the loading of the text file: What is the template you
are running that is going slow?
Engineering/Development here in-house cannot fix a bug we cannot define, or identify.
Saying "WDDX is slow" does nothing. Saying "WDDX translation given X and Y data is
slow vs CF5" helps us more.
This way, a bug can be entered, escalated and a patch can be generated.
Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development
Unix/Linux "special guy"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:08 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources?
>
> >
> > OK, that sounds like good progress so maybe we'll all stop ragging on
> you
> > :)
> You havent given out any peformance tests.. other than MM Perf brief
> I am NOT sure...you guys have any performance test for the details we
> are talking about here...What can you expect from developers..?
>
> > Well, it's apples and oranges... in CF5, WDDX2CFML was written in C/C++
> > and now it's completely rewritten in Java. It's just... different code.
> I'
> > m not on the product team so I don't have access to the source.
>
> Repeated... no spec details given. This news was public.. in NEO/Beta
> releases.
> What would be good information is some like... (eg IIF scales differently
> in
> CFMX Vs CF5.0)
>
> SO the question is : Are there any changes/updates made to
> WDDX...in CFMX Vs CF5.0 (regardless of JAVA/C++ engine.. unicode)?
> that can possibly make it run slower (like the COM issue) yet
> Unknown(TESTING).
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:17 PM
> Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources?
>
>
> > On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 08:54 , Joe Eugene wrote:
> > > I havent come to a final test result.. but i think we are
> > > narrowing
> > > it
> > > down to the Complex Object(WDDX) returned from the data store
> > > that gets parsed out WDDX2CFML..
> >
> > OK, that sounds like good progress so maybe we'll all stop ragging on
> you
> > :)
> >
> > > Custom Tags are probably running ok/fast.. probably its the
> WDDX
> > > parsing..in CFMX that causes the CPU to run 80-90%... Atleast
> we
> > > are seeing a pattern here with tests.
> >
> > Hmm, interesting. That should be pretty easy to performance test.
> >
> > > Is it possible that you can find out..
> > > How the Java Implementation of WDDX2CFML has changed in CFMX?
> >
> > Well, it's apples and oranges... in CF5, WDDX2CFML was written in C/C++
> > and now it's completely rewritten in Java. It's just... different code.
> I'
> > m not on the product team so I don't have access to the source.
> >
> > > Any WDDX implementation changes(Not in docs) will be helpful.
> >
> > It's Unicode capable now - but that's just by virtue of it being
> > implemented in Java. As far as I know, there were no specific behavioral
> > changes (except what's in the release notes etc).
> >
> > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
> >
> > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> > -- Margaret Atwood
> >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________________
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
