It's not opposite. WDDX has performance issues. However, I was able to work around those issues and create an application that performed great.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ V: 415-577-8070 F: 415-341-8906 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:30 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > "I have successfully been able to achieve great performance out of WDDX > intensive applications using CF 4.5, 5, and MX" > > > > The below is opposite to your statement. > > > > > The use of WDDX was not a performance related one as obviously WDDX > > doesn't perform that well. > > > > Joe > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 5:15 PM > Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > > > The use of WDDX was not a performance related one as obviously WDDX > > doesn't perform that well. We used WDDX as a way of marshalling data > > between the presentation and business tiers as well as marshalling data > > between CF and a variety of other programming languages. Quite simply, > > the use of WDDX was an architectural decision that had serious > > performance implications that we had to work around. > > > > Personally, I have always thought the WDDX Java library sucked and as > > such have maintained a private fork of the code. I don't know if the > > CFMX WDDX implementation makes use of the Java classes found at > > http://www.openwddx.org, but I certainly have need to modify those > > classes for my use. > > > > I am currently looking into using JAXB to replace the WDDX serializer > > and deserializer classes. > > > > Matt Liotta > > President & CEO > > Montara Software, Inc. > > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > > V: 415-577-8070 > > F: 415-341-8906 > > P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ben Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:05 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > > > > > > > Sorry, I no longer work for the companies in question, so I can't > > give > > > > exact details. > > > > > > It doesn't have to be details about the work for the company itself. > > > There > > > seems to be a lot of factors in determining whether your > > application(s) > > > ran > > > with great performance (i.e. number of users, where you used WDDX, > > etc) > > > and > > > I'm curious as to how you gauge them. While I can see how someone > > would > > > be > > > able to write an application that uses WDDX better than someone else's > > > app, > > > I'm not sure how you determined that your app ran with great > > performace. > > > In > > > my understanding, there will always be overhead with WDDX because you > > have > > > to serialize and deserialize. > > > > > > Can you also give some of your ideas on when someone should use WDDX, > > when > > > not to, certain things to watch out for, etc? > > > > > > For myself, my favorite part about WDDX is being able to transfer data > > to > > > Javascript easily. Beyond that, I haven't had _too_ much use for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ben Johnson > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
