Sean, I would love to see this happen... an option to declare Types... same a locks....nothing is enforced.. kinda deal..
> Yes, it's certainly one possible approach, allowing the user to declare > variables with a type (and extending the CF types to include "integer" > would also be a useful enhancement, instead of just "numeric" and "binary" > ). Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 12:56 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: FW: Jsp Vs Cfm (CFMX) -- Test Code > > > On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 09:41 , Dick Applebaum wrote: > > Rather I suggest that CFMX allow us to tell it a variable's type > > (optionally) so that it can use that to generate efficient code, > > That would make ColdFusion quite a different language! :) > > > I actually prefer the code analysis approach since it allows CFMX's > compiler to evolve without requiring users to change their code and could > substantially speed up certain constructs in legacy code. > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
