Well, I could certainly use Oracle where I am now. In a serious way. There's no way mySQL even comes close to what our team needs.
----- Original Message ----- From: Paris Lundis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:23 pm Subject: Re: WOT: MySQL in the Enterprise > Oh no I agree, more features = more bloat... > > But how often do you see a car comparison and see a Porsche > (100k+$) > and a VW (20k) head-on dead heat race to the end line? > > It's truly encouraging to see open source and home brewed stuff > pulling > serious load... > > As far as I am concerned Oracle is a big hunk of overpriced (read > too > dam* expensive) crud... sure if you are a bank or some other > oversized > monstrosity it is for you... all 5% of the total businesses if > even > that... > > Anyway... MySQL is just marvelous from here... fast, small, easy > to > manage... great cost - even if you are paying / licensing for real... > > Just so fed up... remember Oracle slobs in a previous life saying > oh > yea... 250k to rent the Oracle for a quad processor workgroup > server > running Slowlaris... 600k to actually buy it... We ended up > sinking a > few hundred K of real money into the crap... Sure it was good > exposure > but how in the heck can anyone say oh yeah we are going to drop a > half > mil on a program... > > For $600k I could create 3 real companies... Oracle is smoking > crack. > period... If the downturn takes them under I won't shed a tear. > > Paris Lundis > Founder > Areaindex, L.L.C. > http://www.areaindex.com > http://www.pubcrawler.com > 412-292-3135 > [finding the future in the past, passing the future in the present] > [connecting people, places and things] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:04:24 -0700 > Subject: Re: WOT: MySQL in the Enterprise > > > Why are people surprised about the performance of mySQL versus > > whatever? Generally speaking, the more features an application has, > > the slower it will be. Thus, we can say that the more features a > > database has (seeing as how a database platform is actually just an > > application), the slower it will be. It's a miracle that Oracle is > > as fast as it is :) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Cutter (CF_Talk)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:00 pm > > Subject: Re: WOT: MySQL in the Enterprise > > > > > Huge article in this weeks E-Week regarding the use of mySQL > for > > > all of > > > Rhode Island's inter/intranet sites > > > > > > Cutter > > > > > > Paris Lundis wrote: > > > > > > >Well I can't say I am enterprise.. even if I have a few > tables > > > with a > > > >couple of million rows of data... > > > > > > > >Checkout the MySQL site and see their consulting arm... I > > > remember when > > > >I first started considering MySQL, their then cleint list and > > > >datawarehouse size was quite large.. fairly impressive amount > of > > > data...> > > > >A lot of people are bound to bring up the SQL compliance > issue > > > and lack > > > >of robust SQL fancy database query stuff... The eWeek article > was > > > right>on I think about performance... having used both.... > > > > > > > >Your mileage will vary based on the nature of what you are doing > > of > > > >course... > > > > > > > >Funny how the most expensive solution (Oracle) and the least > > > expensive>(MySQL) performed so closely :) > > > > > > > >Paris Lundis > > > >Founder > > > >Areaindex, L.L.C. > > > >http://www.areaindex.com > > > >http://www.pubcrawler.com > > > >412-292-3135 > > > >[finding the future in the past, passing the future in the > > present] > > > >[connecting people, places and things] > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: "Scott Mulholland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:53:26 -0500 > > > >Subject: WOT: MySQL in the Enterprise > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>I am researching the use of MySQL in use with enterprise level > > > >>applications, looking for feedback both good and bad. > > > >>I have read all the articles on the mySQL site, as well as > the > > > manual>>and the eWeek article comparing it with Oracle. > > > >> > > > >>Anyone on this list using it currently and have any > > success/horror > > > >>stories or stats? > > > >> > > > >>TIA, > > > >>Scott > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
