Thanks for the insight. This is really helpful. It's pretty amazing that this stigma continues to dog CF to this day. It is still perceived as a "designer's platform." One colleague referred to it as "sort of like Front Page." Heh.
Thanks again, Rich -----Original Message----- From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:05 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Good Ol' Cold Fusion Performance Question Rich this is a question that has been aired in various forms many times. I can give you my experience having used CF seriously since version 1.54 and having worked for Allaire and MM as a field based Consultant (read Troubleshooter). My view is very much from a CF angle. >From a coding standpoint in terms of getting an application coded well and out of the door nothing has ever bettered CF. The advent of Fusebox also added the possibility of using a well distributed framework which we find is greatly in demand in the larger enterprise operations. Fusebox is moving into other paradigms (PHP, ASP, JSP) etc but it much more evolved for CF. In my time at Allaire and Macromedia I saw applications of all sizes. Wherever there were perfomance issues they always related back to bad coding or dodgy infrastructure. Once these items were corrected CF was always able to scream. I had two large CF user clients paranoid that they had lost most of their site users because stability and system loads were suddenly amazingly better. One of them was one of the worlds large Auto manufacturers and they had bloody busy sites. So my point of view is that CF Sites coded well in a workable scalable and understandable framework cannot be beaten from a web application standpoint and this is historical. When you add to that the possibilities before us with the MX Family, all the rest really do pale IMHO. Kind Regards - Mike Brunt Original Message ----------------------- Hello all: I'm new to this list but have always been a fan of CF's elegance and power for years. I am a manager in dev shop and the classic argument arises when CF comes up: can CF perform on par with jsp? Php? Asp? .net? Is there anything out there in terms of a comparative study of some sort that lays it all out? My guess is that it will be slower than Jsp since its in effect a layer on top of java (so is JSP I suppose, but I'm guessing its closer to Java than CF is, someone correct me if I'm wrong here). I'd be glad to present to case for future technology decisions where I'm at, but I don't feel like I have the ammunition. Anyone? Thanks, Rich ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
