Point taken! :-) Yes, there is an 80MB or so hit per instance. It is not for every little site, no question about it.
-----Original Message----- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:39 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CrystalTech says ALL variables must be locked Ben Forta wrote: > > Regardless, it is worth noting that problems caused by the lack of > locking (CF4.x and CF5) can be slow and gradual. On a shared box you > may see memory corruption problems (do to the lack of locking) even if > your app has no shared scope variables at all. How? If another app on > the box uses shared scopes and fails to lock code. All CF apps share > the same instance. > > Which is why CFMX on J2EE is so compelling. Each app runs in its own > safe little world. If only running a few hundred instances wouldn't require a mainframe... Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
