Well, I for one am very glad there's something like Fusebox out there. Saves me a bunch of time setting up a framework... Mind you, I'm looking more towards mach-ii than FB4.
Now FB2, that was lame :) ----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Kotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:42 pm Subject: Cons to Fusebox > In most cases, your individual fuse files for Fusebox 3 will work > without modification in Fusebox 4. However, if you want to use > some of the more advanced features of Fusebox 4 (content > components specifically) it may require some changes to the way > you are outputting things. > > Furthermore, because you can execute multiple Fuseactions in > Fusebox 4 without using CFMODULE and with no performance penalty, > you can probably reuse some of your FB3 CFMODULE fuseactions > without much change in FB4. > > Really, the only people who will have trouble porting to Fusebox 4 > are people who grew overly-reliant on CFMODULE (who's slower > performance is a CF issue not a Fusebox issue), or who > intermingled too much programming logic into their displays (a > symptom of deeper problems than simply a challenging conversion to > FB4). > You can keep on using FB3 for as long as you want, you don't HAVE > to upgrade. But unfortunately in the real world, technologies > have a limited lifespan. If you have a C application and you want > to reap the benefits of C#, you have to recode. That's real life. > Luckily, a great deal of the guts of an FB3 application will port > cleanly to FB4 in most situations. > > Hope that helps, > > Brian > > >Brian Kotek wrote: > >>Performance in Fusebox 4 is almost 10 TIMES better than Fusebox > 3. > >In > >>other words, a page that took 400 milliseconds to render in > Fusebox 3 > > > >>takes about 40 milliseconds to render in production mode with > Fusebox > >4. > > > >So what happens to all the folks who hitched up their wagons to > FB3? > >Time for a free (i.e. unbillable) do-over? How does this reflect > on > >the cost of implementing FB3, in retrospect? Will new-cause but > >similar-effect issues arise in FB4? > > > >I'm anxiously awaiting fb4's release as I very much want to give > it a > >look. Standardization is good; disciplined code is good. > Torpedoed > >performance and a limited lifespan after adoption is terrifying. > > > >-- > >------------------------------------------- > > >Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com > >------------------------------------------- > > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
