No-one here is in control of any particular file...we just ensure that when people do work on individual files : they can always be pieced together without error.,
-----Original Message----- From: Mosh Teitelbaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 July 2003 16:27 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Cons to Fusebox I'm not sure that there was, but in case there was some misunderstanding, by "crunch time" I meant when things start getting hectic, time is running out, last minute changes, etc. In my own experience, and this is from having been a code grunt to an architect to a project manager to just about every other aspect of a project you can think of, a team is better able to handle any challenge when all (or as many as possible) members of the team have a solid understanding of the overall architecture. I've found that requiring and enforcing strict ownership of individual files can become a nightmare when new requirements, bug fixes, or unforeseeables occur. It's always been better when any number of available (key word that) developers can step up and resolve any number of problems. This is not to say that other approaches can't work, but I'd rather be able to use any resource I have for any problem occurs rather than having to wait on a single resource becoming available. -- Mosh Teitelbaum evoch, LLC Tel: (301) 942-5378 Fax: (301) 933-3651 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.evoch.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:10 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Cons to Fusebox > > > We too work in such a manner....i.e. multiple developers on the same fuses > etc, the reason we seem to have it working is that we have a very > strict set > of code guidelines which outline : style, variable names etc.... > > At present what tends to happen is one developer works on the display page > which can automatically be used across mutiple fuses etc and one developer > writes the actions pages as stored procedures..... > > When it comes to crunch time, they all link together sweetly.. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mosh Teitelbaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 July 2003 16:06 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Cons to Fusebox > > > Mosh Teitelbaum wrote: > > >Are the changes made by one person or three? If > > >three, have you found it difficult to coordinate everyone's time > > and effort? > > Jamie Jackson wrote: > > I can't think a time when this has been an issue (yet). If necessary, > > I could always go into their fuse and make the mod myself, but we've > > been happy staying out of each others' code so far. > > This is pretty much the point I was getting at when I asked "In your > experience, how often do you have one developer working on the form and > another working on the action file?" My point was that, when you have > different developers working on different aspects of a single functional > unit (i.e., display, logic, data for a single "action"), it can become > difficult to respond to changes in the requirements without > having to cross > those borders. > > It sounds as if, so far, you've been able to succeed in that regard, and I > congratulate you on that. I just wonder how successful it will be come > crunch time, or when a developer gets moved to another project, or any > number of other problems that are unfortunately common. > > -- > Mosh Teitelbaum > evoch, LLC > Tel: (301) 942-5378 > Fax: (301) 933-3651 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > WWW: http://www.evoch.com/ > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
