On Saturday, Aug 9, 2003, at 15:33 US/Pacific, Rich Z wrote: > 1. One of the things I'd like to do is populate a user's session > with a user object that persists. Now my concern here is that this > object is being created for each authenticated user. I'm assuming that > all methods effectively get copied ot every user as well (again I'm > assuming). This sounds expensive. If I get to 200, 300, etc. concurrent > logged-in users, is this an inefficient way to do things?
macromedia.com uses session scope instances of CFCs and supports 15,000-20,000 concurrent sessions during peak traffic - I wouldn't worry about a few hundred users! > 2. Another sort of related quesiton is the idea of an object having > other objects (i.e. composition). Here's my concern here. Let's say > I've > got a user object that has one to many bookmarks associated with it. If > a user has say 15 bookmarks, this also seems inefficient. Why do you think it's inefficient? Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
