One further note, the time required for the 'ls' command is only slightly faster than CFMX.  The command 'ls' required 76 seconds whereas CFMX required about 84 seconds.  
(If you run this test yourself, be sure to logout then log back in to avoid any filename caching.)  All CF5/CFMX/ls tests were run on RH 7.2.
---
sh-2.04$ pwd
/tmp/dirlist
sh-2.04$ time ls -l > /dev/null


real    1m16.403s
user    0m1.060s
sys     1m13.330s
--

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Erat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfdirectory = slow

>> "I would still like an answer to my original question as to how to bring this to macromedia's attention."

Nelson,

I logged bug 53607 for this.  Thanks for pointing it out.

Interestingly, while working with an test directory containing 31000 files, CFMX 6.1 required 83 seconds to run the cfdirectory tag as measured with getTickCount(), but CF5 on the same machine with same code and same directory required 154 seconds.  I ran the test several times and found the times were mostly consistent within about 1 sec.

-Steven Erat

  _____  


[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to