I guess I don't need to point out my +1 here. Anyway, my thinking is
that if you don't provide the information needed the editor will
continue to function, but what offer the same functionality.

-Matt

On May 31, 2004, at 10:46 AM, Raymond Camden wrote:

> > I'd also point out, that there are times when I want to use
>  > full featured editor, but don't necessarily need/want to set
>  > up a project just to edit a couple of rogue files.
>  >
>  > So, I want both a project view and a normal o/s file
>  > view--depending on how I'm working at the moment.
>  >
>
>  A huge +1 on this. I hate editors that make me jump through hoops
> just to do
>  quick edits. Projects should _not_ be required, period. If it means I
> lose
>  features (like maybe right clicking on a cfinclude and loading the
> file it
>  loads), thats fine.
>
>  -Ray
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to