As for our spam filters - your CFMAIL code is causing our spam filters to flag your headers as forged and headers from Outlook Express as OK. The apparent difference seems to be your message-id header (which is created by CFMX's underlying Java code). For example, here is a Message ID header from CF:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here is one from Outlook Express:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So, my SPAM filter sees the other Outlook-style headers and sees that the message-id header is not an Outlook header and flags the mail.
I would suggest adding a CFMAILPARAM to specify the message-id header as one possible solution.
HTH,
--
Howie Hamlin - inFusion Project Manager
On-Line Data Solutions, Inc. - www.CoolFusion.com
inFusion Mail Server (iMS) - The Award-winning, Intelligent Mail Server
PrismAV - Virus scanning for ColdFusion applications
>>> Find out how iMS Stacks up to the competition: http://www.coolfusion.com/imssecomparison.cfm
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Leder
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 1:41 PM
Subject: RE: CFMail Sanity Check
>> Our SPAM filter, BTW, is tagging mail generated from your code as having
forged Outlook headers.
There was some discussion a while back about how the X-mailer, if set to
Cold Fusion (the default) would trigger spam filters/blocking as well (since
it was hypothesized that only bulk mail would come from CF, and therefore,
its spam). The Outlook (or express) was deemed at that time an acceptable
alternative. So, can the assumption be that neither work now - what's a
legit, above board, double opt-in list emailer to do?
Thanks, Mark
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
