can ya do. I certainly have no control over M$ greed. So I do without
and usually what I substitute with is usually better. So I can't say
that I am worse off.
Ian
----- Original Message -----
From: dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:02:45 -0400
Subject: Re: galleon
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
doesnt help when your platform wont support m$ products
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Qasim Rasheed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:35:54 -0400
>Have you thought about using SQL server Express instead of Access?
>
>Qasim
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Ian Sheridan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:26:41 -0400
>Subject: Re: galleon
>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I would defiantly advocate for support of MySQL. Why? I develop on a
>MAC and I have MySQL installed. and I stage on Solaris so I really do
>not have access to MS Access. There are a bunch of other pluses to
>having MySQL but I'm sure you know the list.
>
>Ian
>
>
>
>On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:30:46 -0500, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There will be an official mysql release. Do people think mysql support
>> is more important than ms access?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:40:10 -0400, dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > has anyone converted this too mysql yet?
>> > (from raymond on devnet 8)
>> >
>> >________________________________
>>________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
