Indeed, we are an global Microsoft house and we use ColdFusion, and ASP, and ..NET.. We don't care to be honest.. Whatever fits.
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -----Original Message----- From: Tom Kitta To: CF-Talk Sent: Sat Sep 30 17:05:55 2006 Subject: RE: CF vs. .NET presentations? Teddy, Maybe we can take this thread and make it more useful by showing strengths of both technologies, how they can interact, how we can produce better websites etc. At least this would make the conversation more mailing list administrator friendly (I think). TK -----Original Message----- From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 September 2006 16:11 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF vs. .NET presentations? This CF vs. .Net presentation mailing thread has been in active contribution most of the past week. I have seen heated debates and acknowledgements on both sides. In essence, what is the result for this thread? Are people trying to argue that one technology is a silver bullet for a solution over the other? This seems rather fruitless in the end. Whether you are an advanced user or a beginning user, there should be an emphasis on growth. You are only as valuable as your ability to adapt and problem solve. It behooves any developer to expand his/her knowledge on various technologies. The more solution sets that you can become familiar with, the more that you can truly evaluate a solution for the best course of action. If a client said, "I have a purely Microsoft environment," then it would make sense to offer a Microsoft solution now wouldn't it? If you have diverse network environment, you will want a a diverse solution. You can offer a BlueDragon solution and/or an Adobe solution. Even if you are a salary employee, you should always be thinking that you are a paid consultant. Think objectively and find the best course of action. If you can seperate your bias and use your objectivity, you may find avenues that were not there before. Do not fear change, embrace it. This goes for a CF and a .Net developer. Let's stop pointing out differences and point out how we can work together or how similar we actually are. Enough cliches for one post. Have a good weekend all, Teddy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:254878 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
