He told you why, the depth of the zip etc. As Eclipse contains jars etc the nested zip is pushing it beyond it's limit.
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -----Original Message----- From: Eric Roberts To: CF-Talk Sent: Wed Jun 27 01:40:07 2007 Subject: RE: CF Editor If it is a Vista problem, why don't I have a problem with any other zipped file that I have come across...with the SOLE exception being Eclipse. It sounds like an Eclipse problem to me. Eric -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 7:14 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Editor > The Eclipse people also seem to have a bad attitude. On > Vista, there seems to be a problem unpacking the code using > the native unzipper. While all my other zipped files that > have been zipped by WinZip and WinRar seem to work fine, > Eclipse requires the use of a third party package to unzip. > This is something that the Eclipse peole are unwilling (and > have stated so) to fix by using a better compression package > instead of some off the wall open source POS one. Yeah...it > has a lot of issues. DW, unfortunately, is still the better > product by far. This is a flaw with the Vista unzipper, and I don't think there's anything that the Eclipse people could do, practically speaking. It has to do with directory depth, which due to the complexity of Eclipse packaging is pushed to the limit. > DW, unfortunately, is still the better product by far. I don't really know why everyone wants to compare these two things. They're not really comparable tools at all. Eclipse is an IDE for programming, and Dreamweaver is an HTML editor. I find them complementary, and wouldn't want to do without either. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! This email has been processed by SmoothZap - www.smoothwall.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJS Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:282326 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
