On Feb 6, 2008 12:24 PM, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't agree with that at all. > > the use of CFCs doesn't necessarily have anything to do with object > oriented design. Lots of CFCs are just groupings of functions to > perform application tasks. But they're not really object oriented at > all, they're functional.
just 'cuz i think this could be an interesting convo... then why use CFCs at all? if you're just grouping similar functions together, why not just a cfinclude to a .cfm? paul kenney actually addressed this a lil' while back: http://www.pjk.us/paul/index.cfm/2007/4/11/Why-do-you-use-CFCs interesting read :) -- Evelyn the dog, having undergone further modification pondered the significance of short-person behaviour in pedal depressed, pan-chromatic resonance, and other highly ambient domains. "Arf," she said. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:298391 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
