> just 'cuz i think this could be an interesting convo... then why use
> CFCs at all?  if you're just grouping similar functions together, why
> not just a cfinclude to a .cfm?

One good reason is you can cache the CFC in the Application scope (as long 
as it is a "singleton"), so it's always in RAM thus the performance is 
better, and then you can do Application.mycfc.mymethod() which is handy.

-- Josh 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:298393
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to