> just 'cuz i think this could be an interesting convo... then why use > CFCs at all? if you're just grouping similar functions together, why > not just a cfinclude to a .cfm?
One good reason is you can cache the CFC in the Application scope (as long as it is a "singleton"), so it's always in RAM thus the performance is better, and then you can do Application.mycfc.mymethod() which is handy. -- Josh ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:298393 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
